Imperative of a new Nigeria National Communication Policy
It
was a rare honour and privilege to be part of the august gathering of
communication experts from across the country that gathered on October 17 and
18, 2016 at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru near
Jos. It was a rainbow coalition of sort. Participants were drawn from the
Academia, Civil Society Organisations, Political Parties, Regulatory Agencies,
Media Professionals, Research Institutes, Professional Bodies and Security Agencies
to brainstorm on Nigeria’s National Communication Policy and Strategy. Some 29
years ago, precisely in 1987 at Administrative Staff College of Nigeria in
Badagry, Nigeria produced her first draft National Mass Communication Policy
which effectively came into operation in 1990. Efforts were made in 2004 and
2013 to revise the policy; unfortunately, this is yet to be consummated.
According
to NIPSS, last week’s conference was aimed at providing a platform for
stakeholders to dialogue on the need for a comprehensive National Communication
Policy and Strategy for the country; carry out a diagnostic review of the NCPS;
conduct a Strategic Gap Analysis of the NCPS; and also make recommendations and
proffer implementation strategies. In a paper entitled “Diagnostic Review of
National Communication Policies and Strategies (1987 – date)” ace broadcaster, lawyer, newspaper
columnist and former Director General of
Nigerian Television Authority, Dr. Tonnie Iredia said inter alia that Nigeria was 17 years late to have her first NCPS in 1987. Even at that, the effort was neither
well-articulated nor comprehensive. It was also too ‘governmental’ and heavily ministerial,
having left out the private media. He
also observed that public communication system in Nigeria is politicised, just
as he submitted that the country’s communication efforts remain elitist, city
based and urban bias.
Not
wanting to be seen as mere arm-chair critic, Iredia made the following
recommendations: citizen journalism/ new media trends should be recognised;
institutional actors need to be better mobilised; public media should belong to
the people; systems approach should be applied to formulation / implementation
of policy / strategy; and lastly, Nigeria’s communication policy document
should be integrative.
In a
presentation entitled “Strategic Gap Analysis of Nigeria’s Communication Policy
and Strategies (1987 – date), Dean of Faculty of Communication, Bayero
University, Kano, Prof. Umaru Pate observed among other things that the
“Implementation of the national communication policy was not successful due to poverty, inconsistency in
direction of government, emerging global realities, corruption, difficult operational climate,
weakening government investments and failing public media sector,
commercialisation and its consequences, skewed elite and urban centred
orientation and absence
of local participation”. Speaking
on the last attempt to review the country’s communication policy in Calabar in
2013, the communication expert said the vision of the reviewed policy was to
make Nigeria “a communicating nation”: sustain open, constant, widespread,
inclusive, constructive and development-oriented communication. The objectives
include enhancing quality of life of Nigerians, resolving social conflicts, and
facilitating systematic, coherent and comprehensive implementation of the Millennium
Development Goals and other national priorities.
Among
the yawning gap noted by Pate on the last NCPS was the fact that the review
process was not broad based as it did not address the need to integrate policy
implementation at the three levels of governance viz. Federal, state and local government
levels. The eminent scholar also noted that
the extant national communication policy has a huge gap between the existence
of the policy and its understanding among the stakeholders. Additionally, there is a hiatus between the
spirit and letter of the policy and its implementation while very little
visible efforts have been made by the government to make it work.
Many
of the participants criticised the renaming of the country’s National
Communication Policy as National Information Policy in 2013 owing to the
separation of Ministry of Communication from Information. Despite the big gap
earlier identified above by various speakers, the chair of Centre of Excellence
in Multimedia and Cinematography / Radio Unilag 103.1 FM, Prof. Ralph Akinfeleye in his paper entitled “Nigeria’s
National Communication Policy and Strategy: Approaches, Policy And Possible
Options” observed that “In what appeared
like a fall-out of the review exercise for the National Information Policy in
2013, the federal government in April 2015 announced the granting of broadcast
license to a total of 17 community radio stations distributed across the six
geo-political zones of the country.” Unfortunately, only three of these
seventeen are currently operational.
Akinfeleye
reiterated the need for a consistent and clear-cut communication policy that
fosters national development. The renowned communicator stressed the need to
de-emphasise urban journalism and put more emphasis on rural communication,
community journalism or what he tagged ‘Peoples’ Press’. He argued that since
most of our media houses are city-based, the rural areas and people are usually
neglected or ‘information starved’ particularly on developmental issues as
encapsulated in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
President
of Association of Communication Scholars and Professional of Nigeria, Prof. Lai
Oso in a paper entitled “Challenges for Nigeria’s Comprehensive Policy and
Strategy” noted that “ICTs as tools of globalisation has no doubt weakened the
capacity of nation states to control what comes in through the airwaves.”
Global public sphere, he noted, is not only open but admits just anybody,
anytime from anywhere at any location. He subsequently called for the need to
identify the organs through which the policy will be implemented when
eventually revised.
There
were far too many paper presenters and discussants whose views can be captured
in a synthesis like this. Suffice to say that the conference ended with a Declaration.
I was privileged to be part of the team of four that crafted the nine point Declaration
which includes the following: The need for one comprehensive, integrated and
functional national communication policy for the country. This should reflect
the Constitution, national core values and align extant and relevant policies;
there is a need to constitute a committee of experts to fill in the identified gaps
expeditiously using scientific research in line with global best practices; the
national communication policy and strategy should be locally relevant,
culturally nuanced and should serve Nigeria’s national interests.
Others
are: the NCPS along with a clear action
plan should be reviewed every five years. The action plan should include
training, research and measurement of effectiveness; the review process should
include government and non-governmental stakeholders (private sector, civil society,
and political parties); the NCPS should
include the strategic communication needs of security and non-security Ministries,
Departments and Agencies; the NIPSS should engage with all relevant MDAs
required to expedite the completion of the review of the NCPS as well as the
necessary action plan (possibly within six months); the outcome of the
Stakeholders’ Conference should be presented to the National Council on Information
meeting of October 26 – 29, 2016 in
Asaba, Delta State and the National Council on Communication.
Follow
me on twitter @jideojong
Comments
Post a Comment