Understanding new campaign finance law in Nigeria
THERE is no gainsaying that
election is a money-guzzler. The popular lingo by Nigeria’s ace hip-hop
artiste, Davido, that “if you don’t have money, hide, your face” depicts the
situation in Nigeria’s political climate. To say the least, it is capital intensive.
Just last week, the Peoples Democratic Party on Wednesday, March 16, 2022,
announced the cost of the Expression of Interest and Nomination Forms as
follows: “State House of Assembly – Expression of Interest – N100,000;
Nomination Form – N500,000; House of Representatives – Expression of Interest –
N500,000; Nomination Form N2m; Senate – Expression of Interest – N500,000;
Nomination Form N3m; Governorship –
Expression of Interest – N1m; Nomination Form – N20m; President – Expression of
Interest – N5m; Nomination Form – N35m.”
PDP National Publicity
Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, announced the development after the joint meeting
of the Board of Trustees and the National Executive Committee of the party. The
PDP spokesperson further said the NEC of the party approved a 50% reduction in
nomination fees for youths aged 25 to 30 years for various elective positions.
Nomination form is about the
least of all the expenditure items of serious political contestants. Huge
resources are spent on consultations with key stakeholders such as traditional
rulers, religious leaders, youth leaders, women leaders and party leaders.
Campaigns before party primaries and after becoming party nominees also gulp a
lot of money. Imagine the cost of political adverts in print and electronic
media, running a well-resourced campaign office, paying for security,
organising rallies and paying for polling agents on the day of the election.
These are aside from the large sum used for vote-buying as well as expenses for
possible pre-election and post-election litigation.
In order to rein in campaign
finance abuses and ensure a level playing field for all contestants, the new
Electoral Act 2022 has spelt out campaign finance ceilings and penalties for
violations. The campaign finance thresholds are in two folds: One for the
candidates and another for the political parties.
Section 88 of the new Act
places limitation of election expenses on candidates. Sub (2) says the maximum election expenses
to be incurred by a candidate at a presidential election shall not exceed N5bn
(Used to be N1bn); (3) The maximum amount of election expenses to be incurred
by a candidate in respect of governorship election shall not exceed N1bn. (Used
to be N200m); (4) The maximum amount of election expenses to be incurred by a
candidate in respect of senatorial and House of Representatives seats shall not
exceed N100m and N70m respectively (It used to be N40m and N20m respectively);
(5) In the case of State Assembly election, the maximum amount of election expenses
to be incurred by a candidate shall not exceed N30m (Used to be N10m).
Furthermore, subsection (6)
says “In the case of a chairmanship election to an Area Council, the maximum
amount of election expenses to be incurred by a candidate shall not exceed N30m
(Used to be N10m) sub. (7) says in the case of Councillorship election to an
Area Council, the maximum amount of election expenses to be incurred by a
candidate shall not exceed N5m. (Used to be N1m) and subsection (8) says no
individual or other entity shall donate to a candidate more than N50m.
(Formerly N1m).
This upward review has
generated a lot of furore in political circles and among the Nigerian public
with many saying the amount is humongous and has priced elections beyond the
reach of average Nigerians. While this may be true, we, however, must
understand that the previous ceilings in the Electoral Act 2010 have become
grossly unrealistic given the fact that it was done 12 years ago. Inflationary
trends and devaluation of the naira have seriously weakened the purchasing
power of the nation’s currency. Aside from that, the campaign period has also
been extended from the initial 90 days to 150 days to election (Section 94(1).
It then means candidates will
spend more than they used to do. It should also be noted that it is not
mandatory that all the contestants must spend up to the ceiling. For popular
candidates, who may find it difficult to raise money for their electioneering
project, the law permits them to engage in crowdfunding. That was what former
US President, Barack Obama, did to raise funds for his presidential campaigns.
If a contestant has high-net-worth friends, the fact that individuals can now
donate N50m in support of their preferred candidates has also made fundraising
for political campaigns easier.
It is instructive for the
president, governors and local government chairpersons to know that according
to section 95 (2) of the new Act, state apparatus (money, vehicles, personnel,
aircraft, public buildings) including the media shall not be employed to the
advantage or disadvantage of any political party or candidate at any election.
As the saying goes, a
community that has no law will not also have punishment for offences. In the
case of Nigeria’s elections, there are laws and there are also punishments for
violations. Take for instance, s. 88 (9) of the Act says, “A candidate who knowingly
acts in contravention of this section, commits an offence and is liable on
conviction to a fine of 1% of the amount permitted as the limit of campaign
expenditure under this Act or imprisonment for a term not more than 12 months
or both.”
Subsection (10) says “Any
individual who knowingly acts in contravention of subsection (9) is liable on
conviction to a maximum fine of N500,000 or imprisonment for a term of nine
months or both.” While sub. (11) says
“An accountant who falsifies, or conspires or aids a candidate to forge or falsify
a document relating to his expenditure at an election or receipt or donation
for the election or in any way aids and abets the contravention of the
provisions of this section commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a
fine of N3,000,000 or imprisonment for a term of three years or both.”
As per political parties, the
Act says in s.89 (2) that election expenses incurred by a political party for
the management or the conduct of an election shall be determined by the
Commission (i.e. INEC) in consultation with the political parties. To the best
of my knowledge, the Commission has not been doing this though it is an old
provision.
Section 90(3) says “A
political party shall not accept any monetary or other contribution which is
more than N50,000,000 unless it can identify the source of the money or other
contribution to the Commission.” This is from N100,000 prescribed in s. 93(3)
of EA 2010. The implication of this is that a lot of monies from anonymous
sources could be mobilised to fund political parties in Nigeria.
In order to promote
accountability and transparency in political finance in Nigeria, the political
parties are expected to file three reports to the election management bodies,
i.e. INEC. The first is the annual report. S. 86. (1) of the Act says “Every
political party shall submit to the Commission a detailed annual statement of
assets and liabilities and analysis of its sources of funds and other assets,
together with statement of its expenditure including hard and soft copy of its
list of members or in such a form as the Commission may require”
The second is election
contribution report, S.90 (4) of the Act says “A political party sponsoring the
election of a candidate shall, within three months after the announcement of
the results of the election, file a report of the contributions made by
individuals and entities to the Commission.” The third is the election expenses
report. S.89 (3) of the Act says
“Election expenses of a political party shall be submitted to the Commission in
a separate audited return within six months after the election….”
Comments
Post a Comment