Financial recklessness of Nigeria’s political leaders
Politics ordinarily should be
a call to serve. So do politicians tell us during campaigns. They claim they
want to serve us. However, the opposite is the case. The main attraction to
politics in Nigeria is for personal aggrandisement and primitive accumulation
of wealth. That is why our elections are very fierce and war-like. It is simply
“do or die.” Nigeria runs a winner-takes-all, zero-sum game politics whereby
with the slimmest of margin lead, a contestant is declared a winner while the
first runner-up, no matter how close to the winner, loses every of his
political investments – money, time, material resources including goodwill.
Unlike in the United States
where there is no unnecessary indulgence of political office holders, Nigeria’s
political leaders, both elected and appointed, live large. They have
chauffeur-driven luxury cars at their beck and call. They live in official
quarters with stewards, gardeners, cleaners and other domestic servants paid
for by the Nigerian state. Thus, they do not have to spend any money from their
personal purse while in office. Even their health and those of their family
members are maintained with state resources. Only God knows how much the
Nigerian state paid to maintain the health of ex-President Muhammadu Buhari who
frequently went on medical tourism to the United Kingdom; neither do the people
of Ondo State know how much the state had spent thus far on the ailing Governor
Oluwarotimi Akeredolu who has been down with an undisclosed ailment which has
kept him away from the Alagbaka Government House in Akure, the state capital.
Over the weekend, the 2023
governorship candidate of the Action Democratic Congress in Lagos, Funsho
Doherty, wrote an open letter to the Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu.
In a post on X, Doherty said, “I just wrote an open letter to the Governor on
Public Procurement awards reported by LASG for the 2nd and 3rd quarters of
2023, highlighting a number of issues for further scrutiny and remedial action.
Judicious use of public funds is always important, and is especially so now.”
In the letter, he noted that
the sum of N440,750,000 was awarded to the Office of the Chief of Staff for the
“procurement of a brand new bullet-proof Lexus LX 600 for use in the pool of
the Office of Chief of Staff.” Other items flagged are the “provision of supply
items (rechargeable fans, rechargeable lights and fridge in the office of the
deputy governor” which was procured under the office of the deputy governor.”
The item was awarded to Judkom Enterprises in July 2023 at the sum of N2bn
(2,017,840,000). Also pointed out was the sum of N7,475,000 awarded for the
“replacement of the liquid fragrance in the Office of Mr Governor, Lagos House,
Ikeja.
The government reportedly
approved N152m for the restoration of water supply at Idunganran palace, the
official residence of the Oba of Lagos. Records allegedly showed that the state
would spend N581m to renovate Saint Andrews Anglican Church in the Oke-Popo
area of the state. The Office of the Deputy Governor was awarded N30m for
monthly outreach of indigent citizens by the wife of the deputy governor. The
office also got another N30m for empowerment programme. In addition,
decorations for the venue of political delegates were reportedly done at the
sum of N20,084,550.
“Flying hours’ expenses for ad
hoc charter plane by Lagos State Government were awarded for the sum of
N400,000,000,” he wrote. It added that sundry consultancy services received
generous allocations ranging from N2bn to N7bn from the state. The Daily Trust
newspaper (online edition) of November 20, 2023, also reported that Sanwo-Olu
approved N73.1m for President Tinubu’s portrait and N44.8m for the clearing of
vegetables (whatever that means) within the Epe Mixed Development Scheme.
According to The Guardian
(Nigeria) of November 20, 2023, it is not only Lagos State that’s involved in
financial profligacy; mention was also made of the Oyo State Government who
allegedly spent N43.5m to purchase 55 fire extinguishers in the 2023 budget.
The newspaper posited further that according to state statistics, Benue State
Governor, Hyacinth Alia, has also earmarked N2,040,780,000 for the purchase of
cars for himself, his deputy, members of the state House of Assembly, and other
state officials. The money was approved on September 5, 2023, according to
state financial documents. The Guardian said, “It is just one of the governor’s
many questionable expenses, which have totaled more than N40bn in just five
months.”
Recall that in 2015 shortly
after leaving the governor’s office, allegations of financial and personal impropriety
surfaced against the then Lagos State Governor, Babatunde Fashola(SAN). Fashola, who later became a super Minister of
Works, Housing and Power under the Muhammadu Buhari administration, was said to
have spent N78.3m on the upgrade of his official website, N139m on the drilling
of two boreholes at the Government Secretariat and was accused of awarding a
N640m contract to a German engineering firm, Julius Berger, for the
reconstruction of a car park and other associated works at the Lagos House Marina,
his official residence.
Meanwhile, according to The
Guardian newspaper earlier referenced, Lagos State is sinking into a debt
crisis like every other state in the country. As of the end of June 2023 the
state government sat close to one-sixth of the total domestic debts owed by the
sub-national entities. In absolute terms, it owed N996bn to local debtors
captured and managed by the Debt Management Office. Its $1.26bn external debt
is also disproportionately higher– almost 30 per cent of the value of external
debt commitments of all the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
Do I blame the governors for
extravagant lifestyles and spending on governance? No! As the saying goes, it
is the front horse that the back ones use to pace. The governors are copying
from the Federal Government. Was it not recently that news came out that N5bn
was spent to procure a Yacht for the president? This newspaper in its November
6 edition reported that, “Despite the unprecedented level of poverty and
hardship in the country, a review of the newly approved 2023 supplementary
budget showed that the Federal Government allocated the sum of N5.095bn for the
purchase of a presidential yacht under the capital expenditure of the Nigerian
Navy.” Also in the supplementary budget, N4bn was earmarked for the renovation
of the president’s residential quarters in Abuja, with an additional N4bn
allocated for the renovation of Dodan Barracks for the President. Moreover,
N3bn has been designated for the renovation of the vice president’s official
quarters in Lagos, while N2.5bn has been allocated for the renovation of Aguda
House.
For vehicle purchases, the
breakdown shows: N2.9bn for SUVs, N2.9bn for the replacement of pool vehicles,
and N1.5bn for the purchase of official vehicles for the Office of the First
Lady. Another significant expense is the construction of an office complex in
the State House, with a budget of N4bn. It is noteworthy that it is not only
the executive arm that is involved in these spending sprees or jamboree. The legislative
arm has also been caught in the same web of financial profligacy. The National
Assembly recently budgeted over N40bn for the procurement of exotic cars for
official use of members while about N70bn was also earmarked for the renovation
of the Assembly complex. Meanwhile, the DMO recently said Nigeria’s total
public debt hit N87.38tn at the end of the second quarter, representing an
increase of 75.29 per cent or N37.53tn compared to N49.85tn recorded at the end
of March 2023.
While this frivolous and
mindless spending by the federal and sub-national governments goes on, 133
million Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty while about 40 per cent of
employable youths are not gainfully employed. This disconnect between our
political leaders and the citizenry is why there is a lot of cynicism about
politics being about service. Meanwhile, about 27 states have a life pension
scheme for the governors and deputy governors. Why should our leaders be living
large on our behalf with little or nothing left for the ordinary citizens? With
this profligacy in government, how can the cost of governance be reduced and
good governance entrenched? Very unfortunate!
Comments
Post a Comment