Creation of Ministry of Livestock Development needless
“To enable Nigeria to finally take
advantage of livestock farming, we have seen the solution and opportunity for
this adversity that has plagued us over the years and I believe the prosperity
is here in our hands.” – President Bola Tinubu while announcing
the creation of Federal Ministry of Livestock Development on Tuesday, July 9,
2024.
Introduction
On
Tuesday, July 9, 2024, President Bola Tinubu announced the creation of Federal
Ministry of Livestock Development. Following the approval, he said the Federal
Government is fully prepared to cover the cost of acquiring lands to ensure the
peaceful co-existence of pastoralists and farmers. This came as he inaugurated
the Renewed Hope livestock reform implementation committee at the State House,
Abuja. While President Tinubu will chair the committee, a former chairman of
the Independent National Electoral Commission, Attahiru Jega, is the deputy
chairman. The committee is expected to propose recommendations aimed at
fostering a peaceful co-existence between herders and farmers, ensuring the
security and economic well-being of Nigerians.
The
PUNCH of July 9, 2024 (online edition) reported that on September 14, 2023, the
National Livestock Reforms Committee recommended that Tinubu create a “Ministry
of Livestock Resources” to, among other deliverables, reduce the decades-long
gory conflict between farmers and nomadic cattle herders nationwide. Former
Kano State Governor and Chairman of the All Progressives Congress Chairman,
Abdullahi Ganduje, disclosed this to State House Correspondents shortly after
he led the committee in an audience with the President at the Aso Rock Villa,
Abuja. It formed part of 21 recommendations captured in a document submitted to
the President to enhance the Federal Government’s holistic response to the
lingering cases of bloodshed.
The
document spelt details of the proposed solutions where the committee advocated
a reform agenda examining conflict mitigation and resource management. “This
agenda should include the establishment and resuscitation of grazing reserves
as suggested by many experts and well-meaning Nigerians and other methods of
land utilisation. Create the Ministry of
Livestock Resources in line with practice in many other West African countries.
In the alternative, Federal and State Governments should expand the scope of
existing Departments of Livestock Production to address the broader needs of
the industry,” it read.
Previous efforts to resolve Herders versus
Farmers conflict
There
is no gainsaying the fact that pastoralists ad farmers’ conflicts have a long
history but became most pronounced under the immediate past administration of President
Muhammadu Buhari. In the Kaduna, Benue, Plateau, Nasarawa and Taraba axis alone
hundreds if not thousands of people have been killed and millions displaced
from their ancestral lands and homes as a result of this lingering crisis. The
creation of the ministry is the latest attempt by the Nigerian government to
address the decades-long conflict between herders and farmers over access to
land, pasture and water.
In the
past, previous governments have reeled out a raft of measures including reforestation,
Great Green Wall, Building of Dams for irrigation, importation of grass,
creation of grazing routes, the highly controversial Rural Grazing Area (RUGA),
Cattle Colony and an 82-page National Livestock Transformation Plan (2019 –
2028). According to International Crisis Group, “In 2019, Nigerian authorities
launched a ten-year National Livestock Transformation Plan to curtail the
movement of cattle, boost livestock production and quell the country’s lethal
herder-farmer conflict. But inadequate political leadership, delays, funding
uncertainties and a lack of expertise could derail the project. COVID-19 has
exacerbated the challenges.” It is believed that if the NLTP can be overhauled,
it still provides the best roadmap and blueprint to resolving the pastoralist
and farmers age-long conflict.
Why creating Ministry of Livestock
Development may not resolve the conflict
What
is the definition of livestock, according to the Britannica online dictionary,
livestock includes both beef and dairy cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses,
mules, asses, buffalo, and camels; the raising of birds commercially for meat
or eggs (i.e., chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, guinea fowl, and squabs) is
treated separately. This means that not all animals are covered by livestock.
Poultry farming and fisheries are exempted. It just doesn’t make much sense to
treat only a section of the animal preferentially.
Secondly,
there is already a Department in the Federal Ministry of Agriculture that is in
charge of livestock. Why not strengthen that Department to make it more
efficient and functional? If that department is well resourced, and is given
the mandate to implement the National Livestock Transformation Plan, with
appropriate Key Performance Indicators and adequate funding, it should be able
to deliver.
Thirdly,
President Tinubu already has a bloated cabinet with about 34 ministries and 48
Ministers. The performance of these ministers have been largely lackluster in
the last one year of their being in office. In the face of dwindling economic
resources, inability to resolve the new national minimum wage for workers, huge
debt portfolio and the presidential order to reduce the Departments and
Agencies in line with the Steve Oronsaye report, it is baffling that the
president will deem it fit to establish additional ministry. This new ministry
may well have two minsters which will then bring the number of the cabinet to
50!
The
other issue here is that creating a new ministry mid-year will present funding challenging
for proper take off. This is because the ministry was not captured in the 2024
FG budget. The new ministry will need office space, full complement of staff,
equipment, and office furniture. Thus proper take off of the new ministry may
not be until next year. Furthermore, the new bureaucracy being created will
substantially increase the overhead and cost of running this government. I
don’t think there will be value for money creating this new ministry.
Furthermore,
it is doubtful if the state governors are carried along in the FG plan.
Interestingly, the FG has no square meter of land anywhere in Nigeria. By
virtue of the 1978 Land Use Act, all lands are vested in the state governor who
holds it in trust for the people. Part of the challenge NLTP faced under
ex-President Buhari was the unwillingness of most of the southern states
governors to give part of their state’s land for the take off of ranching. Resuscitating the already obliterated grazing
routes of the ‘60s in 2024 will be problematic as the land in question may have
been used for residential housing or building purposes having been parceled out
to beneficiaries. I do hope the plan of the federal government to acquire land
from the state will yield positive results.
If the
federal government is establishing a new ministry with the aim of resolving
farmers – herders conflict, what is the president doing to support other forms
of animal husbandry in particular rabittry, poultry and fisheries. Farmers in
these sectors too needs to be encouraged to contribute meaningfully to the food
security agenda of the Tinubu Administration.
I am of the considered view that if the federal government of Nigeria
can get the buy-in of the sub-national government viz. States and Local
Governments, it will achieve greater success in its food security agenda.
Conclusion
I
understand the burning desire of President Tinubu to resolve the conundrum
surrounding the herders – farmers conflict in Nigeria. However, creating
additional layer of bureaucracy will not solve the lingering and protracted
challenge. FG should try to fashion a bottom-up approach to resolving this
age-long dispute and not vice versa. Reforestation of the deforested northern
part of Nigeria and making the herders to embrace modern techniques of livestock
farming will yield better result than just creating additional ministry.
Jide
Ojo is a Development Consultant, Author, columnist and Public Affairs Analyst.
Comments
Post a Comment