NASS vexatious media accreditation requirements
“The NASS guidelines negate the
constitutional principle of freedom of expression and run contrary to the
African Charter on fundamental rights and the right of the people to know. The
Guild strongly objects to these guidelines in their entirety as they serve no
public good except the myopic interest of its chroniclers and purveyors.” – General
Secretary of Nigerian Guild of Editors, Mary Atolagbe while reacting to the new
accreditation guidelines for journalists released by the National Assembly on
May 20, 2019
I
like the way News Agency of Nigeria captioned the story, “NASS stings media
houses: Sets stringent accreditation guidelines”. A fresh attempt to gag the
Freedom of Information and Press Freedom was made by the National Assembly on
Monday, May 20, 2019. A new re-accreditation guidelines signed by the Director
of Information in NASS, Mr. Emmanuel Agada Esq was released to the public
barely three weeks to the June 11, 2019 inauguration of the 9th
National Assembly. The most disappointing thing was that there was no rationale
given for the introduction of the new accreditation guidelines which has been
described as “Satanic” by the Nigerian Union of Journalists.
Some
of the 20 conditions listed by the management are evidence of incorporation of
the media organisation, proof of membership of the NUJ with registration number
and the code of certification from the National Library of Nigeria. Others are
circulation of at least 40,000 newspaper copies daily with evidence to support
the claimed figure, evidence of 5,000 daily views in the case of online media
and photocopies of media organisation’s tax return for at least two years. Other
requirements for fresh accreditation are evidence of membership of professional
bodies for media organisation, a functional bureau in Abuja with staff strength
of not less than five editorial staff publishing daily and on weekend. Also,
the re-certification form must be signed and endorsed by the Chief Executive
Officer of the media organisation and the bureau chief, or the city editor as
the case might be.
While
the Nigerian Union of Journalist through its National President, Mr.
Christopher Iziguzo, said the action of the Assembly was against the spirit of
free press and that the Union “have given the National Assembly 24-hours within
which to withdraw the satanic guidelines.”, the Nigerian Guild of Editors in a
statement by its General Secretary, Mary Atolagbe said inter alia that “The Guild urges all media houses across the nation
to rise up and reject this medieval intrusion into the media space in the 21st
Century, much more in a democracy which Nigerian media doggedly fought for and
for which some journalists paid the supreme price.”
There
is no gainsaying that Nigerian media is once again under siege unfortunately by
institution of democracy which is the people’s parliament. I was privileged to
be among the panelists that spoke on the occasion of 2019 World Press Freedom
Day organised by Safer Media Initiative in conjunction with United Nations
Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation on May 2, 2019. There I pointed
out that much as Nigeria ranks top among African countries with vibrant media;
however, from time to time, Nigerian press is still being subjected to
excruciating attacks by institutions of government.
As a
proof of Nigeria’s press freedom retrogression, the 2019 ranking of press freedom
which was conducted by Reporters without Borders, also known as Reporters Sans
Frontières, saw Nigeria drop a place from 119 in 2018 to 120, among 180
countries. RSF bemoaned the incessant harassment and intimidation of
journalists by military officers and politicians in the country. The
international NGO also stated that journalists in Nigeria experience obstacles
when reporting stories that have to do with politics, terrorism and financial
embezzlement. It thus challenged that “The defence of quality journalism and
the protection of journalists need to be priorities during Buhari’s second
term.”
It
will be recalled that under this administration, The PUNCH State House correspondent, Lekan Adetayo was
unceremoniously sent packing by the Chief Security Officer to the President,
Bashir Abubakar in April 2017. Jones Abiri, publisher and editor of the Weekly Source newspaper based in Bayelsa
State was detained by Directorate of State Services for over two years; in
August 2018, Samuel Ogundipe of Premium
Times was wrongfully detained by the Nigerian Police while the Army invaded
the Maiduguri and Abuja offices of Daily
Trust in January of this year.
Some
obvious attempt to gag the media in the last four years also includes the
introduction of an anti- social media bill, sponsored by Senator Bala Ibn
Na’Allah (APC, Kebbi State). In March 2018 Senator Sabi Abdullahi (APC, Niger State} came
with another toxic bill called “Hate
Speech Bill” which carried a death sentence and allegedly meant “to eliminate hate speech and discourage
harassment on the grounds of ethnicity, religion or race among others.” In July
2018, there was yet another attempt to gag the press with the introduction of the
“Press Council Amendment Bill 2018, to regulate the news media and ‘assist’ in
registering journalists in Nigeria.”
Back
to the new National Assembly accreditation guidelines, is it possible for the
NASS management to come forth with the rationale behind the provocative
guidelines? Do the NASS Press Corps constitute security threat or nuisance to
the functioning of the Assembly? Are the accredited journalists a drain on the
resources of the NASS? What is National Assembly trying to hide?
As
far as am concerned, the unilateral introduction of these draconian guidelines
is not acceptable. Whatever concerns that may have warranted the review of
conditions for accreditation of journalists covering the National Assembly
should have been raised with the different media regulatory bodies and unions
such as the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission, Nigerian Press Council, Nigerian
Guild of Editors, Nigerian Union of Journalists, and the Newspaper Proprietors
Association of Nigeria. There are enough laws in the statute books to deal with
professional misconduct of any media house or journalists. Press freedom in
Nigeria is non-negotiable!
Comments
Post a Comment