Mahmood Yakubu’s reappointment as INEC boss
On Tuesday, October 27, 2020,
the President, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), officially reappointed
Prof. Mahmood Yakubu as the chairman of the Independent National Electoral
Commission. In an official communication to the Senate President, Ahmed Lawan,
the President said he was making the appointment in consonance with the
provisions of Section 154 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). This appointment has been widely commended.
However, did the President fulfil all righteousness in making that appointment?
NO!
Section 154(3) of the Nigerian
Constitution says, “In exercising his powers to appoint a person as Chairman or
member of the Independent National Electoral Commission, the National Judicial
Service Council, the Federal Judicial Service Commission or the National
Population Commission, the President shall consult the Council of State”. To the best of my knowledge, the last Council
of State meeting held in accordance with provisions of Section B of the Third
Schedule of the Nigerian Constitution was on August 27, 2020 and there was no
mention of consultation or approval of the reappointment of Yakubu then. Even
when the President met with former presidents and Heads of State on October 23,
2020 over the #EndSARS protests, there was no mention of any discussion on the
appointments in INEC. Was this an oversight? If it was, then it can be rectified
so as not to expose the reappointment to unnecessary litigation. Recall that
due process was followed on October 21, 2015 when Yakubu and five national
commissioners were first appointed after due consultation with the Council of
State before their confirmation by the Senate and swearing in on November 9,
2015.
Aside from that constitutional
lapse, Yakubu’s reappointment is meritorious. Interestingly, he’s the first
INEC boss to be reappointed. Many thought Prof. Attahiru Jega served two terms
but that is not true. He was only lucky to conduct two general elections – 2011
and 2015. Jega was appointed on June 8, 2010 and ended his tenure in June 2015
before Amina Bala Zakari was appointed in an acting capacity before the
nomination of Yakubu.
Among his reported
achievements in his first tenure are: the return of voting procedures to
simultaneous accreditation and voting. Recall that in the elections conducted
by Jega, accreditation and voting took place separately due to the fact that
the biometric National Register of Voters compiled by Jega in January/February
of 2011 was presumed bloated and there was a need to devise a method to check
multiple voting. Thus, accreditation took place between 8am and 12 noon,
thereafter there is 30 minutes of voter education as well as forming electorate
into queues. Under this arrangement, there is no closing time for voting as
this largely depends on when the last person in the queue must have voted. Why
did Yakubu’s INEC have to discontinue with this voting method?
According to the European
Union Election Observation Mission official report on the 2015 General Election
in Nigeria, approximately 2.3 million accredited voters did not come back to
vote in the afternoon. In a tightly contested presidential election, this can
sway victory one way or the other. These millions of accredited voters did not
show up because the voting process was too cumbersome. This was why INEC under
Yakubu discontinued with that method. The INEC boss also ensured that
Continuous Voter Registration is being done as prescribed in Section 10 of the
Electoral Act 2010, as amended. On February 28, 2018, INEC under Yakubu did the
unprecedented by announcing the dates
for Nigeria’s general elections for 36 years, that is, from 2019 – 2055. This
was done to enhance electoral planning.
Commendably, the INEC boss has
essentially been building on the solid foundation laid by his predecessor in
office, Attahiru Jega. He has continued with the crafting of Strategic Plans
for the Commission, review of the INEC Gender Policy, expanded the Inter Agency
Consultative Committee on Election Security to include representative of
Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, holding of Stakeholder meetings and signing
of Peace Accord by candidates ahead of general election and off-cycle governorship
polls. He followed that up by having Mrs. Rose Oriaran Anthony succeed Mrs.
Augusta Chinwe Ogakwu as the Commission’s secretary.
However, it stands to the
credit of his INEC that in his first tenure, the commission came up with INEC
Framework on Access and Participation of Persons with Disabilities in the
Electoral Process. Under this framework, INEC was able to accredit Disability
Persons Organisations for election observation. Before then, only a few
organisations such as Inclusive Friends Association, Joint National Association
of Persons with Disabilities and The Albino Foundation got accreditation as
members of the Civil Society Election Situation Room. However, under Yakubu,
they are accredited as a stand-alone entity. Furthermore, INEC now provides
Braille Ballot Guide for the People living With Disability with visual
impairment, Election Day written instruction to aid communication with people
with hearing disability as well as Magnifying Glass for persons with Albinism.
Yakubu is the first INEC
chairman to conduct elections during a pandemic in Nigeria. His commission came
up with a new policy framework known as the ‘Policy on conducting elections in
the context of COVID-19 pandemic’. Under this policy, filing of candidates’
nomination by political parties, and accreditation of observer groups, party
agents and journalists were done electronically. Voters also have to undergo
temperature checks, maintain social distancing and wear face masks when coming
to vote. So far, he has conducted three elections under COVID-19. The first was
on Saturday, August 8, 2020, in the Nasarawa Central State Constituency
by-election. He has also conducted two off-cycle governorship elections in Edo
on September 19 and Ondo on October 10, 2020.
These elections had been
deemed highly credible because of another innovation by INEC. This is the
Election Result Viewing Portal better known as IRev which enables members of
the public to follow authentic election results as they are being announced
from the Polling Units to the Ward, Local Government and State Collation
Centres.
INEC under Yakubu also
assisted in the fight against COVID-19 by releasing hundreds of the
commission’s vehicles to the NCDC for contact tracing and other logistics.
While the President got it
right by reappointing Yakubu, he however wasn’t very much on point with the
earlier nomination of four INEC commissioners on October 13, 2020. He courted
public opprobrium by nominating one of his media aides, Ms. Lauretta Onochie,
as a commissioner. Other nominees are Prof. Mohammed Sani from Katsina State;
Prof. Kunle Ajayi from Ekiti State and Seidu Ahmed from Jigawa. The public
outrage over Onochie’s nomination is due to her perceived partisanship. This is
against the letter and spirit of Section 156(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution.
Assuming without conceding that she is not a card-carrying member of the All
Progressives Congress, there is a moral burden she will carry while serving in
INEC. I hereby strongly advise the President to withdraw her nomination and
replace her with another lady without any moral or legal baggage.
For Yakubu, he will have to
build on the success of his first tenure and avoid the mistakes he has made. It
is heartwarming that the President made the appointment in order to prevent a
vacuum in the election management body. I will enjoin the President to put his
executive weight behind the ongoing electoral reform agenda of the National
Assembly and see to it that this is expeditiously concluded before the middle
of 2021. This will give the EMB sufficient time to plan for the 2023 General
Election. Already, INEC is getting ready to give Nigeria electronic voting by
inviting about 40 manufacturers of electronic voting machines to come and
exhibit it to the commission. But there is a legal hurdle to be crossed as
Section 52 of the 2010 Electoral Act, as amended, forbids the use of Electronic
Voting Machines. Beyond legalese, INEC has yet to find a lasting solution to
the perennial challenge of electoral violence and vote trading. Will he succeed
this time round? Time will tell.
Comments
Post a Comment